Accessibility of Psychiatric Assessment for Capital Crime Offenders with Mental Illness in China
Abstract
This article investigates the accessibility of psychiatric assessment for capital crime offenders in China. At present, only the judicial authority agencies can order an assessment whereas suspects’ requests for mental evaluation are subject to the approval of the former, who, in practice, tend to accept requests from suspects bearing misdemeanor charges, but are inclined to refuse to conduct an assessment when dealing with felony offenses. This article begins with an introduction to the legislation related to psychiatric assessment in China, and is followed by an investigation of the factors militating against China’s judicial authority from ordering a psychiatric assessment for capital crime offenders raising the defense of insanity. It then examines the public stigma in Chinese society and concludes that the punitive attitude toward mental illness will continue influencing stakeholders’ choices in the context of psychiatric assessment as long as China’s judicial system emphasizes the superiority of social stability over individual human rights.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jlcj.v5n1a1
Abstract
This article investigates the accessibility of psychiatric assessment for capital crime offenders in China. At present, only the judicial authority agencies can order an assessment whereas suspects’ requests for mental evaluation are subject to the approval of the former, who, in practice, tend to accept requests from suspects bearing misdemeanor charges, but are inclined to refuse to conduct an assessment when dealing with felony offenses. This article begins with an introduction to the legislation related to psychiatric assessment in China, and is followed by an investigation of the factors militating against China’s judicial authority from ordering a psychiatric assessment for capital crime offenders raising the defense of insanity. It then examines the public stigma in Chinese society and concludes that the punitive attitude toward mental illness will continue influencing stakeholders’ choices in the context of psychiatric assessment as long as China’s judicial system emphasizes the superiority of social stability over individual human rights.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jlcj.v5n1a1
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 29 |
Yesterday | 52 |
This Month | 245 |
Last Month | 4821 |
All Days | 1926229 |
Online | 11 |